Overreporting of Reported (S)AEs

Overreporting of Reported (S)AEs Table
Type of indicator Risk
Risk category Safety
Golden KRI NO
Therapeutic area General
IF risk event A site reports substantially more (serious) adverse events ((S)AEs) compared to other sites participating in the same study
DUE TO risk causes Misunderstanding of (S)AE reporting criteria, inconsistent application of definitions, differing approaches to collecting AE data from participants, or duplicate reporting
THEN risk impact may result Increased uncertainty about the investigational product’s safety profile, potential misinterpretation of data, and regulatory challenges during submission or approval
Risk indicator Overreporting of reported (S)AEs
Metric Rate of (S)AEs per site
Unit %
What level should be measured Study, country, site
Purpose Ensure consistent safety reporting practices across all study sites and detect potential outliers whose reporting behavior may indicate procedural misunderstandings, duplicate reporting, or differing standards of AE assessment.
Description This KRI evaluates whether a site’s (S)AE reporting rate is disproportionately higher than that of other study sites, signaling potential protocol non-adherence or inconsistent safety data collection methods.
Formula

Calculate the percentage difference between the rate of (S)AEs at the site (entity) and the average rate of (S)AEs across the study.

Express the absolute difference relative to the study-level rate: ((|site AE rate − study AE rate| ÷ study AE rate) × 100%).

Suggested thresholds - high 130%
Suggested thresholds - medium 120%
Associated metric 1 Number of serious adverse events (SAEs)
Associated metric 2 Number of adverse events (AEs)
Associated metric 3 Number of participant visits
Associated metric 4 Rate of AEs per visit
Associated metric 5 Rate of SAEs per visit
Do you like the KRI description? Thanks for the feedback There was a problem submitting your feedback. Please try again later.